Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Brooks v. Sonenson et al
as 1:2013cv03275
Plaintiff:
David Brooks
Defendant:
Howard Sonenson, Frank Rizzo, Daniel Rosen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitcher v. Ramos et al
as 1:2012cv03335
Defendant:
Steven Leo D'Alessandro, Loretta Lynch, Robert Marohn and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Pitcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonano v. Alonso et al
as 1:2012cv03646
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonano
Defendant:
Daniel Alonso, Mark Dwyer, Karen Friedman Agnifilo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2012cv01916
Plaintiff:
Arrello Barnes, Peter Lopez, James Moore and others
Defendant:
Susan Smith, Carla Ross, Mawmoon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rizzo et al v. Sheriffs Dept. Employees et al
as 1:2011cv04417
Plaintiff:
Paul Rizzo, Winifred Fortune, Adrian Foote and others
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept. Employees, Jhon Does and Rockland County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deponceau v. United States of America et al
as 9:2010cv00338
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus DePonceau
Defendant:
United States of America, New York State, Monroe County and others
Deponceau v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv02150
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus Deponceau
Defendant:
United States of America, New York State, Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Graham et al
as 9:2008cv00855
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Harold Graham, Brian Fischer, Lucien J. LeClaire and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rizzo v. Rock
as 1:2008cv00269
Petitioner:
Augustine R. Rizzo
Respondent:
David Rock
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Eagen et al
as 9:2008cv00009
Plaintiff:
Frank Brown
Defendant:
Thomas G. Eagen, Karen Bellamy, C.O. Rizzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
