Cases 31 - 40 of 152
Driscoll v. Chemung County
as 18-2361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramonn S. Driscoll
Defendant - Appellee:
Chemung County, Ryan Card, Sheriff Christopher Moss and others
Reeder v. Koenigsmann
as 18-1135
Defendant:
Arlene M. O'Neil, Unit Chief, Attica Correctional Facility, M. Blauvell, Registered Nurse, Eastern Correctional Facility, Deposio, Wende Correctional Facility and others
Appellee:
Anthony Corty Ann, Physician, Shawungunk Correctional Facility, Richard Bunchy, Registered Nurse, Shawungunk Correctional Facility, Costillo, Wende Correctional Facility and others
Appellant:
Raszell Reeder
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Driscoll v. Chemung County et al
as 6:2017cv06752
Plaintiff:
Ramonn S. Driscoll
Defendant:
Chemung County, Ryan Card, Christopher Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quezada v. Koenigsmann
as 17-3148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jose Quezada
Defendant - Appellee:
Carl J. Koenigsmann, John Colvin, Laurine Jones and others
Holmes v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv03874
Plaintiff:
Stanley Holmes
Defendant:
The City of New York, Joseph Ponte, Mingo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. The New York City Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv03250
Plaintiff:
Michael Holmes
Defendant:
The New York City Dept of Corrections, Joseph Ponte, Mingo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harnage v. Murphy
as 17-846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James A. Harnage
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian K. Murphy, Anthony Coletti, Meyers, Lieutenant and others
Holmes v. Crowley
as 6:2017cv06118
Petitioner:
Carl Holmes
Respondent:
Karen Crowley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. Capra et al
as 7:2017cv01313
Plaintiff:
Devaughn Holmes
Defendant:
Michael Capra, M. Royce, Dana Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
