Cases 31 - 40 of 384
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10866
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05942
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cano v. Decker et al
as 1:2020cv08932
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, Acting Sec. of DHS Chad Wolf, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Wilfredo B CANO and Wilfredo B. Cano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Patel v. Warden Stewart Detention Center et al
as 1:2020cv04968
Respondent:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Field Office Director, Warden Stewart Detention Center and others
Petitioner:
Piyushkumar Gandalal Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riley v. Warden et al
as 1:2020cv04715
Petitioner:
Fontaine Lavot Riley
Respondent:
Warden, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Field Office Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mitchell v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv01183
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, James McHenry, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
O'Neil Damion Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Golding v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv06998
Plaintiff:
Karim Golding
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
Giron v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv06995
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Giron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
Thomas v. Barr et al
as 6:2020cv06362
Respondent:
Thomas Brophy, Thomas E. Feeley, William P. Barr and others
Petitioner:
Harvel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
