Cases 31 - 40 of 59
King v. Spring Valley Police Dept. et al
as 1:2016cv06315
Plaintiff:
James Christopher King
Defendant:
Spring Valley Police Dept., Kevin Graiani, David Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nieves v. Lowe et al
as 6:2015cv06441
Plaintiff:
Michael Nieves
Defendant:
Douglas Lowe, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Hollmen et al
as 9:2015cv00888
Plaintiff:
Carlos Sanchez
Defendant:
Linda Hollmen, A. Lowe and M. Mogavero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavis v. Parmiter et al
as 9:2015cv00842
Plaintiff:
George Chavis
Defendant:
Cheryl Parmiter, J. Edwards, Coryers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Fischer et al
as 6:2015cv06108
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Brown
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Mark L. Bradt, W. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Corcoran et al
as 6:2014cv06526
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Young
Defendant:
P. Corcoran, D. Lowe, James Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. Pallito et al
as 2:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Lowe
Defendant:
Andrew Pallito, Vermont Department of Corrections, Dameon Hinnanger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contant v. Sabol
as 14-108
Petitioner - Appellant:
Isan Contant
Respondent:
Warden Mary Sabol
Respondent - Appellee:
State of New York and Warden Craig A. Lowe
Chavis v. Parmiter
as 13-3438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
George Chavis
Defendant - Appellee:
Cheryl Parmiter, IGP Supervisor, Auburn State Prison, G. Robinson, Corrections Officer (Deputy of Security), Auburn State Prison, J. Edwards, Corrections Officer (ABlock Sergeant), Auburn State Prison and others
Chavis v. Parmiter et al
as 9:2012cv01832
Plaintiff:
George Chavis
Defendant:
Cheryl Parmiter, G. Robinson, J. Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
