Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Banks v. Song et al
as 3:2017cv01189
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 3:2017cv00847
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, United States Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cowell v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2017cv00726
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Cowell, Jr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert Stueber, Robert Stueber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Brown et al
as 1:2016cv03083
Defendant:
Joy Brown, Chester Davis, Chet Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Trump et al
as 1:2016cv03253
Plaintiff:
Frederick H. Banks
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Mark Hornak, Sean Langford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2016cv01961
Plaintiff:
Gary Sanchez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, US Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2015cv00223
Petitioner:
Eric Flores
Respondent:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Favor-El v. The Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2015cv06164
Petitioner:
Brandon Favor-El
Respondent:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York State and The Black Panther Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
