Cases 41 - 50 of 537
Anderson et al v. First Transit, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06826
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anderson, James Bellamy, Troy Blount and others
Defendant:
First Transit, Inc., Adam Moore, Junior Dawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schulte v. Denton, Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv05656
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Schulte
Defendant:
David Denton, Jr., Michael Lockard, Sean Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoga v. Stanton et al
as 9:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Alex Shoga and Alex R. Shoga, Jr.
Defendant:
Dave Stanton, Adam Wilcox, Jon Gillette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schulte v. Warden MAAT
as 1:2023cv05241
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Schulte
Defendant:
MAAT and MDC Warden MAAT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allah v. Lawson et al
as 9:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Jaiquan Allah
Defendant:
Ryan Lawson, Aragona, Stratta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schulte v. S. Ma'at et al
as 1:2023cv04855
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Schulte
Defendant:
S. Ma'at, Warden and Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hall v. Jackson
as 2:2023cv04606
Plaintiff:
Beresford A. Hall
Defendant:
Suffolk County, Sufolk County 3rd PCT Police Department, PO Todd Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. USA
as 1:2023cv00528
Petitioner:
Clarence Adams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adams v. The Willows et al
as 9:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
James E. Adams
Defendant:
The Willows and Onondaga County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Wigdorski et al
as 6:2023cv06317
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Myers
Defendant:
Det. Adam Wigdorski, Det. Christopher Gerace, Det. Paul Fitzpatric and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
