Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Alexis v. Gonzales et al
as 9:2007cv00620
Petitioner:
Bayne Alexis
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and James L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yang v. An Unknown Deportation Officer et al
as 1:2007cv04772
Petitioner:
Chao Yang
Respondent:
An Unknown Deportation Officer, Alberto Gonzales and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Watson v. Gonzales
as 1:2007cv00309
Petitioner:
Richard A. Watson
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (a) Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Belopavlovic v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv00607
Petitioner:
Branko Belopavlovic
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Dept of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
