Cases 41 - 50 of 686
Robinson v. Jones
as 9:2022cv01404
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Robinson
Respondent:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grant v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv10375
Plaintiff:
Earl Grant
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Correction Officer John Mendez #5560, Deputy Warden Jane Jones #33 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osman v. Jones
as 9:2022cv01296
Petitioner:
Salad Osman
Respondent:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGill v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2022cv06523
Plaintiff:
Reginald McGill
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester and Trevor Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Capra
as 9:2022cv01203
Petitioner:
Daniel Jones
Respondent:
Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. All cops since 1992 to 96 et al
as 1:2022cv06493
Plaintiff:
Tarnell Leon Jones
Defendant:
All cops since 1992 to 96, 1971 to 1996 to no NYC all cops, All other state 49 other states and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nellons v. Jones
as 9:2022cv01031
Petitioner:
Ricardo D. Nellons
Respondent:
Gerard Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Capra
as 6:2022cv06405
Petitioner:
Daniel Jones
Respondent:
Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ahmed v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv08007
Plaintiff:
Ishtiaq Ahmed
Defendant:
Richard Taylor, Natasha Moseley-Jones, Viodelys Brathwaite and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
CITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00945
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Robinson
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Gerald Jones, Kelly Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
