Cases 41 - 50 of 624
Byrd v. Livingston County Jail
as 6:2022cv06422
Plaintiff:
Justin Adam Byrd
Defendant:
Livingston County Jail, Zach Scott, Deputy Fennell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Parson et al
as 1:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Stephen Jordan
Defendant:
Dave Parson, Joanne Ebling, Michael Fillicetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Lowe et al
as 1:2022cv07710
Petitioner:
Keeba Scott Harris
Respondent:
Craig Lowe and Raymond Tonkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. Lowe et al
as 1:2022cv07697
Petitioner:
Tonia Scott
Respondent:
Craig Lowe and Raymond Tonkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. Warden
as 1:2022cv07075
Petitioner:
Willie Scott
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rech v. Roth et al
as 6:2022cv06299
Plaintiff:
Michael Rech
Defendant:
Alan Roth, Scott Ashlaw, Jeffrey Caraher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Scott Kelly, Earl Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Putnam County et al
as 7:2022cv01877
Plaintiff:
Humberto Rivera, Jr.
Defendant:
Putnam County, Putnam County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Robert L. Langley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01470
Petitioner:
Scott Tucker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Scott v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Allen Rogers Scott
Defendant:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan, Daniell Dill, Mr. Jamie Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
