Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Gutierrez v. Dubois
as 1:2020cv02079
Petitioner:
Ramon Gutierrez
Respondent:
Orange County Sherif Carl Dubois, Francis Russo, William Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Rodriguez Ordonez v. Wolf et al.
as 1:2020cv01727
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Juvenile Coordinator Linda Hyde, Jonathan H. Hayes and others
Petitioner:
Diego Dilan Rodiguez Ordonez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Barrie v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00171
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, William Barr and Thomas Feeley
Petitioner:
Mohamed Sanusi Barrie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Matos v. Barr et al
as 6:2020cv06079
Petitioner:
Jesus Matos
Respondent:
Thomas Feely, Jeffrey Searls, Kevin McAleenan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Baragi v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv10553
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas R. Decker, Kevin McAleenan and others
Plaintiff:
Musa Baragi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rosemond v. Decker et al
as 7:2019cv09657
Petitioner:
Jean Rosemond
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, William P. Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Wilson v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv01364
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, William Barr and Thomas Feeley
Petitioner:
Arvel Wilmark Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Troy v. Barr et al
as 9:2019cv01010
Respondent:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Patrick A. Russo, Gwynne DiNolfo and others
Petitioner:
John Troy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
