Cases 71 - 80 of 63,242
Terron v. Osborn Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Miguel Terron
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cicchiello v. Peters et al
as 3:2024cv00855
Petitioner:
Joan Cicchiello
Respondent:
Colette Peters and R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Younger v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Davon Younger
Defendant:
Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith-Daye v. City of Poughkeepsie et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
David P. Smith-Daye
Defendant:
City of Poughkeepsie, Dutchess County Jail and City of Poughkeepsie Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Lamont White
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banshu v. Haggler et al
as 1:2024cv03524
Plaintiff:
Kahusia J. Banshu
Defendant:
Sholomo S. Haggler, James Edward D'Auguste, Denis Michael Reo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
Diomande v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03509
Plaintiff:
Kassia Diomande
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York Police Officer, John Doe, Unknown Tax ID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duchnowski et al v. LaRusso et al
as 2:2024cv03433
Plaintiff:
Leo Duchnowski
Defendant:
Anthony LaRusso, Dr. Donna Henig, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Angel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Warden and Deputy Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
