Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
NyJah Samiyyah Spencer
Respondent:
Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jean v. USA
as 2:2023cv09174
Petitioner:
Spencer Jean
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Randall v. Oneil et al
as 9:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Carl Randall and Jarrod C. Randall
Defendant:
Colleen M. Oneil, Brian R. McDermott, Peter R. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Barnett et al
as 9:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Carl Randall and Jarrod C. Randall
Defendant:
Peter R. Barnett, James Gayne, Robert Newtown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Oneil et al
as 9:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Carl Randall and Jarrod C. Randall
Defendant:
Colleen M. Oneil, Brian R. McDermott, Peter R. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayo v. Mayo et al
as 1:2023cv03370
Petitioner:
Maurice Mayo, Jr.
Respondent:
Latasha P. Mayo, Janele Hyer-Spencer and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Wehyl
as 6:2022cv06286
Petitioner:
Devante Spencer
Respondent:
Mr. Christopher Wehyl and Christopher Wehyl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
