Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lopez v. Deacon et al
as 7:2023cv07327
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lopez
Defendant:
J. T. Deacon, 4 John Does and Jane or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reidy v. Smith
as 6:2014cv06688
Petitioner:
Jesse Reidy
Respondent:
J. T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pena v. Shartle
as 1:2013cv00938
Petitioner:
Mario Pena
Respondent:
J. T. Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Diaz v. Shartie
as 1:2012cv01226
Petitioner:
Luis Diaz
Respondent:
J. T. Shartie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
De Freitas v. Smith
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2012cv05072
Plaintiff:
Miguel De Freitas
Defendant:
J. T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Smith
as 11-1502
Petitioner - Appellant:
Corey Harris
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. Smith, Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1487
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Radermacher et al
as 1:2009cv00809
Plaintiff:
Jomo Williams
Defendant:
Radermacher, . Wagner, Shlaggel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leeson v. Smith et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 6:2009cv06409
Petitioner:
Dale Leeson
Respondent:
J. T. Smith and New York State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acevedo v. Smith
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2008cv09899
Petitioner:
Samuel Acevedo
Respondent:
J. T. Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.