Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Fredricks v. May et al
as 9:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredricks and Nigel Fredericks
Defendant:
C. May and John Doe Correction Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Paris Production et al
as 1:2024cv01847
Plaintiff:
Charmeen D. Washington
Defendant:
Paris Production, Production Ibiza, MNRK Music Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeanty v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09472
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Jeanty
Defendant:
The City of New York, Camba, Lt. Carlos Serrano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reyes v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
DeQuan Reyes
Defendant:
City of New York, Louis Molina, Eric Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Corey
as 9:2022cv00731
Petitioner:
Nicholas A. May
Respondent:
Joseph E. Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mays v. Syracuse Police et al
as 9:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Navon Mays
Defendant:
Syracuse Police and Robert Durr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis et al v. Delmar et al
as 6:2021cv06738
Plaintiff:
Rommel Lewis and Keisha Knight Lilly
Defendant:
T. Delmar, Superintendent Amy Lamanna, Lieutenant Richard J. Goodliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. Delmar et al
as 1:2021cv10191
Plaintiff:
Rommel Lewis and Keisha Knight Lilly
Defendant:
T. Delmar, Superintendent Amy Lamanna, Lieutenant Richard J. Goodliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Sewalt et al
as 1:2021cv01013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Turner
Defendant:
Timothy Sewalt, Corey May, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Superintendent
as 1:2021cv06482
Petitioner:
Samuel D. Mays
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
