Cases 1 - 10 of 1,892
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06287
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Watson v. Wilhelm et al
as 1:2024cv06826
Defendant:
Tiam Clarke, Daniel J Wadoloski, Isaac Maysonet and others
Plaintiff:
Robert William Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kroemer v. Ritts
as 6:2024cv06510
Plaintiff:
Kent A. Kroemer
Defendant:
James B. Ritts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05654
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nieves v. Barker et al
as 9:2024cv00983
Defendant:
C.O. Bass, C.O. O'Brien, C.O. Loci and others
Plaintiff:
Elvin B. Nieves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kamara v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00743
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Thomas Brophy and others
Petitioner:
Mohamed Daramy Kamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Callender v. Turner et al
as 9:2024cv00958
Defendant:
Albert G. Rodriguez, Clayton A. Jackson, Jeven R. Jayne and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Callender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Pascal et al
as 1:2024cv06085
Defendant:
C.O. B. Mallon, Sgt. L. Pascal and C.O. C. Orso
Plaintiff:
Alvin Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpkins v. Hilton et al
as 9:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Michael Simpkins
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello, III, J. Christopher, B. Hilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Moores et al
as 1:2024cv05844
Plaintiff:
Shy-Tique Kelly
Defendant:
Dr. Bentivenga, Carol A. Moores, C.O. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
