Cases 1 - 10 of 317
Alli v. Sterling et al
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Sterling, Edmund, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv02403
Plaintiff:
David Carter, Sr
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe #1, P.O. John Doe #2, Area Officer John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv01703
Plaintiff:
David Carter, Sr.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dinkins v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
Shaquille S. Dinkins
Defendant:
The City of New York, Deputy Warden Carter, Nurse Jhon Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casby v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Casby and Original Mann
Defendant:
Curtis Boo Boo Jackson, Cardi-B, Fat Joe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Noble v. Carter et al
as 1:2024cv00637
Petitioner:
Jerome Noble
Respondent:
Carter, P.O. Santiago, Batchelor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casby v. Jackson et al
as 1:2023cv11295
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Casby and Original Mann
Defendant:
Curtis Jackson, Cardi B, Fat Joe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noble v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv11014
Plaintiff:
Jerome Noble
Defendant:
Carter, Santiago, Batchelor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Conover et al
as 9:2023cv01359
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Carter
Defendant:
Jamie Conover, N. Pezdek and DOCCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09004
Plaintiff:
Marcus Carter
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, JOHN/JANE 1-10 DOE(S), JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
