Cases 1 - 10 of 1,118
Bennett v. Lander et al
as 6:2024cv06296
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bennett
Defendant:
Officer Lander, Officer Ferguson, Officer McClellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. State Of New York
as 1:2024cv03358
Petitioner:
Stephon Edwards
Respondent:
State Of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banshu v. Haggler et al
as 1:2024cv03524
Plaintiff:
Kahusia J. Banshu
Defendant:
Sholomo S. Haggler, James Edward D'Auguste, Denis Michael Reo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banshu v. Haggler et al
as 1:2024cv03128
Plaintiff:
Kahusia J. Banshu
Defendant:
Sholomo S. Haggler, James Edward D'Auguste, Denis Michael Reo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Marcello Edwards
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Davis
Defendant:
Scott Semple, James Dzurenda, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Edward Maldonado, Carol Chapdelaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobes v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hobes
Defendant:
A. Rodriguez, Superintendent Edward Burnett, Kevin Fierro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevenson v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Stevenson, Jr
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Andres Carroll
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Carol Chapdelaine, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
