Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Dorcinvil v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Jacques Dorcinvil
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Sean Milligan, Laura Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayle v. City of New York
as 1:2020cv06289
Plaintiff:
Telloney Gayle
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayle v. United States of America
as 7:2020cv10086
Plaintiff:
Tyrin Gayle
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gayle v. City of New York
as 1:2020cv05018
Plaintiff:
Telloney Gayle
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden v. Doe et al
as 1:2019cv03839
Defendant:
Mr. Anthony J. Annucci, Mr. Baresse, Ms. Kopp and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Harden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitley v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2018cv02847
Plaintiff:
Vidal Maurice Whitley
Defendant:
Mike Capra, Mark Royce, Linda Carrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gayle v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv08942
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Levar Gayle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Keitt v. John/Jane Doe #4
as 17-1615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Devin Keitt
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Brian S. Fischer, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, State of New York and others
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, #4, as Chancellor of New York City Department of Education, John/Jane Doe, #1, as Principal of Public School 236, John/Jane Doe, #2, Dean and others
Gayles v. Armor Correctional Health Services et al
as 2:2016cv01356
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services and Michael Sposato
Plaintiff:
Neruon Gayles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayle v. Bermudez et al
as 1:2015cv07108
Respondent:
Ana Bermudez and Eric Schneiderman
Petitioner:
Stevano Javed Gayle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
