Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Hussey v. The Owner of/at Duane Reade (Jane Doe / John Doe) et al
as 1:2023cv03561
Plaintiff:
Yessuh Suhyes Hussey
Defendant:
The Owner of/at Duane Reade (Jane Doe / John Doe) and The Owner and person in charge of Walgreens (Jane Doe / John Doe)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rizzuto v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv00515
Defendant:
John J. Morley, Anthony Black, Owen Zweck and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Rizzuto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Surdak Read v. Town of Ramapo Police Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv03044
Plaintiff:
Michelle B. Surdak Read
Defendant:
Town of Ramapo Police Dept., P.O. Buckly, P.O. Furguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Duane Reade Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv07578
Defendant:
Duane Reade Corporation, Chris Oneil and Lewis Ramon Casilla
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Read v. Bell et al
as 1:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
David Paul Read
Defendant:
Benjamin Bell, Vandyken, R. Mayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Read v. Suffern Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv03111
Plaintiff:
David Paul Read
Defendant:
Suffern Police Department, M. Lourenzo, J. Giannittino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Read v. Kwiatkowski
as 6:2015cv06475
Plaintiff:
David Paul Read
Defendant:
P. Kwiatkowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Read v. N.Y.S. Board of Parole
as 9:2015cv00972
Petitioner:
David Paul Read
Respondent:
N.Y.S. Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Read v. Raminini et al
as 9:2014cv01383
Plaintiff:
David Read
Defendant:
Raminini, Munnangi, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Read v. Graziano
as 1:2013cv06962
Plaintiff:
David Paul Read
Defendant:
Graziano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
