Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Blake v. Decker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv09692
Petitioner: Anthony Rohan O"ne Blake and Anthony Rohan O'Neil Blake
Defendant: Thomas R. Decker, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick Garland
Respondent: Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Hankerson v. Royce We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00282
Respondent: Mark Royce
Petitioner: Rohan Hankerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Fierro et al
as 6:2018cv06434
Plaintiff: Adam Christopher Walker
Defendant: Scott Fierro, James Wellington, Todd Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Huffman
as 17-1630
Plaintiff - Appellant: Thomas Dixon
Defendant - Appellee: C.O. Huffman, C.O. Elberth, C.O. D. Ladenhauf and others
Dixon v. Huffman et al
as 1:2017cv03349
Plaintiff: Thomas Dixon
Defendant: Huffman, Elberth, D. Ladenhauf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Huffman et al
as 1:2017cv02740
Plaintiff: Thomas Dixon
Defendant: Huffman, W. Elberth, Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2017cv00517
Petitioner: Rohan Johnson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Campbell v. Lee
as 16-4325
Petitioner - Appellant: Rohan Campbell
Respondent - Appellee: William Lee
Hart v. USA
as 6:2016cv06444
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Rohan L. Fray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Robert N. Daveoren Complex We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00890
Petitioner: Rohan Johnson
Respondent: Robert N. Daveoren Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?