Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Afshar Shandiz v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Ali Afshar Shandiz
Defendant:
State of Texas and Officer Fusilier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luevaro v. Texas State Bar et al
as 9:2023cv01376
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevaro
Respondent:
Texas State Bar and Texas Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luevano v. Guterres et al
as 1:2023cv07922
Petitioner:
Jamie Luevano
Respondent:
Antonio Guterres, Nikki H., Securus Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Conlin v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv03272
Petitioner:
Mr. Jeremy Lee Conlin, John Doe and Texas Doe
Respondent:
United States of America and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wyatt v. Loving et al
as 1:2021cv10447
Plaintiff:
George Wyatt, Jr.
Defendant:
Kelly Loving, State of Texas System Government and Dallas Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
