Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Canel et al v. Legacy Bank of America Pension Plan et al
as 3:2012cv01196
Plaintiff:
Richard Canel , Gordon Elliot , Alan Seymour and others
Defendant:
Legacy Bank of America Pension Plan and Bank of America Corporation Corporate Benefits Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Morales v. Hairy Monk Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv02091
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Morales
Defendant:
Hairy Monk Corp., John Hayes and John Cavanagh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
In GLAXOSMITHKLINE ERISA LITIG
as 11-2289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles J. Gum, on Behalf of Himself and a Class of Persons Similarly Situated and Marilyn S. Hayes
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Does, 1-30
Defendant - Appellee:
Glaxosmithkline Retirement Savings Plan Committee, Andrew Witty, Jean-Pierre Garnier and others
Valentin Garcia v. Hairy Monk, Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv00842
Plaintiff:
Heradio Valentin Garcia
Defendant:
Hairy Monk, Corp. , John Hayes and John Cavanagh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hayes v. Consolidated Masonry, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv01421
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hayes
Defendant:
Consolidated Masonry, Inc. and Steven M. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lankes v. National Grid et al
as 1:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
David Lankes
Defendant:
National Grid, the Vice President of Compensation and Benefits, the Benefits Committee National Grid USA Service Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Hayes v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC et al
as 1:2010cv07275
Plaintiff:
Marilyn S. Hayes
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Glaxosmithkline Retirement Savings Plan Committee, Andrew Witty and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Harris et al v. T&H Security, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv05339
Plaintiff:
Reneard Harris, Reneard Harris, Shawn Hampton and others
Defendant:
T&H Security, Inc., Citadel Special Events Services, Inc., Thomas Ferrara and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
