Labor Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 140
Narciso Cabrera et al v. Joe's Auto Wreckers Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2019cv00564
Defendant: Joseph Forti, Robert Dedonato and Joe's Auto Wreckers Inc.
Plaintiff: Jesus Narciso Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Romero et al v. Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00694
Plaintiff: Diane Shields, Pamela Lee, Irene Thomas and others
Defendant: MTA Bus Company, MTA Headquarters and Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
Ragaglia v. Pontillo's Pizzeria-Gates et al
as 6:2019cv06006
Defendant: Pontillo's Pizzeria-Gates, Does 1-50, Pontillo's Pizzeria-Spencerport and others
Plaintiff: Andrew Ragalia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Espinoza et al v. Dough Joe LLC et al
as 1:2018cv05745
Defendant: Min Lee, Dough Joe LLC and Dough Joe LLC doing business as Hinomaru Ramen
Plaintiff: Alejandro Sucup and Selvin Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wylaz v. Laquila Group Equipment Corp.et al
as 1:2018cv05886
Defendant: Joe Doe, Dino Tomasetti, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff: Wladyslaw Wylaz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chiu v. American Yuexianggui of LI LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv05091
Defendant: Xing Mei Chen, American Yuexianggui of LI LLC and American Yuexianggui of LI LLC doing business as Lou Joe Restaurant
Plaintiff: Yvonne Chiu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rosario v. Charisse & Christine Enterprises, LTD et al
as 1:2018cv07020
Defendant: Joe Doe, Paco Doe, Charisse & Christine Enterprises, LTD and others
Plaintiff: Angel B. Rosario
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Giantonio v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company
as 18-2034
Plaintiff: John J. Giantonio, on behalf of the Chicago Bridge & Iron Savings Plan, The Shaw Group Inc. 401(k) Plan, himself and a class consisting of similarly situated participants of the Plans
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ramesh C. Kinra
Defendant: John Does 1-20 and Richard Roes, 1-20
Defendant - Appellant: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, Investment Committee, Plan Administrator and others
Giantonio v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company
as 18-1886
Plaintiff: John J. Giantonio, on behalf of the Chicago Bridge & Iron Savings Plan, The Shaw Group Inc. 401(k) Plan, himself and a class consisting of similarly situated participants of the Plans
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Ramesh C. Kinra
Defendant - Appellee: Travis Stricker
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, Investment Committee, Plan Administrator and others
Defendant: John Does 1-20 and Richard Roes, 1-20
Argento v. Hi 57, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv04146
Plaintiff: Charles Argento
Defendant: Hi 57, LLC and Joe Cecala
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?