Cases 111 - 120 of 125
USA v. LaRovera et al
as 3:2011cv00773
Defendant:
Joseph LaRovera, Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Key Bank USA, NA and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Perrelli et al
as 3:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Defendant:
Paige Perrelli, Pasquale N. Perrelli and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Rhodes v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 3:2010cv02012
Plaintiff:
Eva M. Rhodes
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank and American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A v. Frydman
as 3:2010cv01936
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A
Defendant:
Perry Frydman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LaFlamme et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A et al
as 3:2010cv01665
Plaintiff:
Robert LaFlamme , Grace LaFlamme and Charles LaFlamme
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A and Ronald Palmgren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhodes v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 3:2010cv01300
Plaintiff:
Eva M. Rhodes
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank and American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Waterford Dental Assoc PC
as 3:2010cv00478
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Defendant:
Waterford Dental Assoc PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Belcher v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 3:2009cv00757
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Belcher
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA, Tahisha Younger, Bridget Cusak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belcher v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 3:2009mc00137
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Belcher
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA, Tahisha Younger, Bridget Cusak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Hunt Leibert Jacobson et al
as 3:2009cv00639
Plaintiff:
Sonja V. Bell
Defendant:
Hunt Leibert Jacobson, Bank of NY Mellon Corp, Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
