Cases 121 - 130 of 331
Jude v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Steven Jude
Defendant:
The City of New York, Department of Correction, Joseph Ponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Phanord et al
as 1:2016cv10042
Plaintiff:
Brandi Simmons
Defendant:
Phanord, Staley, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Phannord et al
as 1:2016cv10032
Plaintiff:
Brandi Simmons
Defendant:
Phannord, Staley, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. New York City et al
as 1:2016cv09969
Plaintiff:
Eryk Ford
Defendant:
New York City, New York City Department Of Corrections, Joseph Ponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. New York City et al
as 1:2016cv09549
Plaintiff:
Cory McGee
Defendant:
New York City, New York City Department of Corrections, Joseph Ponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv09466
Plaintiff:
Vingal Carter
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte and Maxisolaine Mingo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06653
Defendant:
Police Officer Reid Astrida, P. Barnes, Mayor Bill Blasio and others
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06507
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Brown
Defendant:
City of New York, Chief K. Collins, Dept. of Correction of R.N.D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. The City of New York
as 16-3753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marlon Nunez
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Maxsoline Mingo, AMKC Warden and Commissioner Joseph Ponte
Haskins v. N.Y.C. Department of Correctional etc. et al
as 1:2016cv08525
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Haskins
Defendant:
N.Y.C. Department of Correctional etc., Joseph Ponte, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
