Cases 11 - 20 of 466
Hoisington v. WCAX-TV
as 1:2024cv04560
Defendant:
WCAX-TV
Plaintiff:
Miles E. Hoisington, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Alexander et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Joseph Chlad, Mickey Brock, Danny Coronado and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
United States of America v. Williams (Davis)
as 24-1425
Defendant:
RONALD GLEN DAVIS, TERRENCE WILLIAMS, ALAN ANDERSON and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1337
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1253
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shomo v. State of New York
as 24-818
Plaintiff:
JOSE SHOMO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, STEWART ECKERT, Superintendent, individually and in official capacity and others
Mile v. MLJ Painting Corp.
as 2:2024cv02400
Plaintiff:
Winston Mile
Defendant:
MLJ Painting Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Menjivar v. Azar et al
as 2:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Jose Moris Ortega Menjivar
Defendant:
Jorge Luis Azar, Sugar Mile Inc., Maria's Pastry Shop Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 d Federally Assisted Programs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
