Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Ingram IV v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2022cv05067
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Ingram IV
Defendant:
Andrew Cuomo, Thomas P. DiNapoli, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Reyes v. Neal
as 21-2615
Petitioner:
Jose Mauricio Reyes
Respondent:
Jean King, Acting Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Garry D. Malphrus, as Member, Board of Immigration Appeals, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Edward F. Kelly, as Member, Board of Immigration Appeals, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Forbes v. Garland
as 21-1507
Petitioner:
Curry W. Forbes
Respondent:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Field Office Director and Administrator, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Maradiaga v. Decker
as 21-1184
Respondent:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Tae Johnson, in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Javier Castillo Maradiaga
Saleh v. Pastore
as 21-1073
Defendant / Appellee:
Gina Pastore, as Brooklyn Field Office Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice, Lee Bowes, as Acting Field Office Director, Northeast Region, USCIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tarek Youssef Hassan Saleh
Guodoy Arana v. Decker
as 21-296
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Petitioner:
Mercedes Guodoy Arana
Rodriguez v. Garland
as 21-272
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Field Office Director and Administrator, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Nelson Sosa Rodriguez
City of Syracuse, NY v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Fi
as 21-191
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeffrey A. Rosen, in his offficial capacity as Acting Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
City of Syracuse, NY, City of San Jose, CA, City of Columbia, SC and others
Intervenor:
Zachary Fort, Frederick Barton, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. and others
Hylton v. Decker
as 21-145
Respondent:
Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Acting Attorney General Monty Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Petitioner:
Gabrae Hylton
Hernandez-Aviles v. Decker
as 20-3995
Petitioner:
Noe Hernandez-Aviles
Respondent:
Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
