Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Range v. 154 E. 116th Street Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv02445
Plaintiff:
King Range
Defendant:
154 E. 116th Street Corp. , Wings K. Leong , Robert B. Johnsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Burger King Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv03546
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation and Burger King Worldwide
Plaintiff:
Randi Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00815
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02782
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nimely v. Rofar Realty Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02630
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation, Consumer Food Services, LLC and Rofar Realty Co. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nimely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Murray v. New Sarah Flatbush LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01601
Defendant:
971 Flatbush Avenue Operating Corp., Burger King Corporation and New Sarah Flatbush LLC
Plaintiff:
Udean Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Jordan v. Burger King Corporation
as 3:2013cv00324
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Briggs v. Burger King Corporation
as 3:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Arlenda Briggs
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
De La Rosa v. CMF Cohen Realty Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv00837
Plaintiff:
Dedra De La Rosa
Defendant:
CMF Cohen Realty Corp., Burger King Corporation and 130 West 125th Street Operating Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
