Cases 11 - 20 of 112
Faqir et al v. Aerea Salon NYC Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10863
Plaintiff:
Az El Arab Faqir
Defendant:
Aerea Salon NYC Inc., Elizabeth Christensen and Alex Papagiannis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Green v. Christensen et al
as 9:2022cv01307
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Green
Respondent:
D. Christensen, M. Matteau and W. Doty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perry v. Christensen
as 9:2022cv01161
Petitioner:
Damien Perry
Respondent:
David Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Borge v. Christensen
as 9:2022cv01072
Petitioner:
Milko Vilomar Borge
Respondent:
D. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Naya 1740 Fund Ltd. et al v. Coupang, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08756
Plaintiff:
Naya 1740 Fund Ltd., Naya Coldwater Fund, Naya Master Fund LP and others
Defendant:
Coupang, Inc., Bom Suk Kim, Gaurav Anand and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Henderson v. Christensen
as 9:2022cv01041
Petitioner:
Jaquan Henderson
Respondent:
D. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shea v. Christensen
as 9:2022cv01029
Petitioner:
Anthony M. Shea
Respondent:
D. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dennis v. Christensen
as 9:2022cv00997
Petitioner:
Andre' Maurice Dennis
Respondent:
D. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Choi v. Coupang, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07309
Plaintiff:
David Choi
Defendant:
Coupang, Inc., Bom Suk Kim, Gaurav Anand and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Nunez v. Christensen
as 9:2022cv00847
Petitioner:
Ronald Nunez
Respondent:
D. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
