Cases 11 - 20 of 31
MADORE v. WP GLIMCHER, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01203
Plaintiff:
SHARON MADORE
Defendant:
WP GLIMCHER, INC. and Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Madore v. WP Glimcher, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01203
Plaintiff:
Sharon Madore
Defendant:
WP Glimcher, Inc. and Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sondel v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv01861
Petitioner:
Nimali Sondel
Respondent:
Darden Restaurants, Inc., GMRI, Inc. and Willis Reinke
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Sondel v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01861
Petitioner:
Nimali Sondel
Respondent:
Darden Restaurants, Inc. , GMRI, Inc. and Willis Reinke
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Ali et al v. N and D Restaurants of NY et al
as 7:2015cv06384
Plaintiff:
mustafa ali , zakiya ali and suad ali
Defendant:
N and D Restaurants of NY, Darden Restaurants, Inc. and John Gallo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ali et al v. N and D Restaurants of NY et al
as 7:2015cv06382
Plaintiff:
mustafa ali , zakiya ali and suad ali
Defendant:
N and D Restaurants of NY, Darden Restaurants, Inc. and John Gallo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ali et al v. N and D Restaurants of NY et al
as 7:2015cv06400
Plaintiff:
Mustafa Ali , Zakiya Ali and Suad Ali
Defendant:
N and D Restaurants of NY, Darden Restaurants, Inc. and John Gallo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al v. Sondel et al
as 3:2015cv01138
Plaintiff:
Darden Restaurants, Inc. , GMRI, Inc. and Willis Reinke
Defendant:
Nimali Sondel and JAMS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Rocco v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv00822
Plaintiff:
Christina Rocco
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants, Inc. and GMRI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sondel v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04986
Petitioner:
Nimali Sondel
Respondent:
Darden Restaurants, Inc., Willis Reinke, American Arbitration Association, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
