Cases 11 - 20 of 1,415
Trammell v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2024cv06116
Plaintiff:
Andrew Trammell
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Adam Johnson, Cortney Carbonel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv10805
Plaintiff:
Neicha L. Graham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States of America v. Graham
as 24-292
Defendant:
THOMAS DEGREE, JORDAN DAVIS, JOHNNY WILLIAMS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LAIRON GRAHAM, Shah, Uncle Shah and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Graham III v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Sherman Graham III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pappas et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv06010
Plaintiff:
John Pappas, Randy Brenner, Christopher Tabing and others
Defendant:
The City of New York and City of New York
Shabazz v. Graham et al
as 1:2023cv09228
Plaintiff:
Danny Amen Valentine Shabazz
Defendant:
Aubrey Drake Graham, Lucianne Grainge and Universal Music Group
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nixon et al v. Crawford et al
as 1:2023cv07095
Plaintiff:
Elsabasz M. Nixon, M.A.N and I.G.N.
Defendant:
Lorraine Hamiton Crawford and Chad Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
