Cases 11 - 20 of 1,619
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
BNP Paribas SA v. Kashef
as 24-1446
Petitioner:
BNP PARIBAS SA, a French corporation and BNP PARIBAS US WHOLESALE HOLDINGS, CORP., F.K.A BNP Paribas North America, Inc.
Respondent:
ENTESAR OSMAN KASHEF, ABUBAKAR ABAKAR, ABBO AHMED ABAKAR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wallace v. Dinello et al
as 9:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Wallace
Defendant:
David Dinello, Venkata Mannava, Shazia Chaudhry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Alsayedi et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03902
Plaintiff:
Salah Mohamed Alsayedi and S & A 99 Cents Plus Corp.
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
Sikder v. Garland
as 24-1362
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED LOKMAN SIKDER, FARJANA AKTER, MOHAMMED SAFWAN SIKDER and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
