Cases 11 - 20 of 4,576
Board of Education of the Mamaroneck Union Free School District v. D.B.
as 24-1239
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE MAMARONECK UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant:
A. N. S., individually and on behalf of A.B., a minor and D. B., individually and on behalf of A.B., a minor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jennings v. Durham et al
as 9:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Khalil Jennings
Defendant:
Correction Sgt. M. Durham, Correction Officer Devon Delaney, Correction Officer M. Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ortega v. Richard N. Ash Center, M.D., P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv03399
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Rodriguez Ortega
Defendant:
Richard N. Ash Center, M.D., P.C. and Juhi LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
