Cases 11 - 20 of 176
Templeton et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2022cv09631
Plaintiff:
Jerry W. Templeton, Dennis Higgins, George Nunnery and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Gibson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv08922
Plaintiff:
David Gibson, Robert Thomas, Joseph Diaz and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Johnson v. EPA Canada
as 22-2691
Plaintiff:
Nehemiah H+G Construction
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
EPA Canada, Labors International Union Hall, see Earth North Leaks Pond, United States Coast Guard and others
Scott v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08600
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., James G. Kelly, Mark A. Chancy and others
Moore v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08518
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., Rafik R. Sidhom, James G. Kelly and others
Wolfson v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08104
Plaintiff:
Barbara Wolfson
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., James G. Kelly, Rafik R. Sidhom and others
Waterman v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08090
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., Mark A. Chancy, Vahe A. Dombalagian and others
Whitfield v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08085
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., Mark A. Chancy, Vahe A. Dombalagian and others
Leyva Jr. v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07805
Plaintiff:
Luis Leyva Jr.
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., Rafik R. Sidhom, James G. Kelly and others
O'Dell v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07751
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., James G. Kelly, Rafik R. Sidhom and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
