Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Petrocelli v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01343
Defendant:
Matthew Hoffman, Joseph Reimo, United Parcel Service General Services Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Petrocelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Baquedano v. United Parcel Service General Services Co. et al
as 1:2014cv00786
Plaintiff:
Cristian Baquedano
Defendant:
United Parcel Service General Services Co. and Robert A. Kreitzer Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Starke v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 12-4023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Adam Starke, on his behalf individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
United Parcel Service, Inc., AKA United Parcel Service Co., AKA United Parcel Service General Services Co.
Migdal Insurance Company Ltd. et al v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07308
Plaintiff:
Migdal Insurance Company Ltd. and Brian J. Newcombe
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc. and United Parcel Service General Services Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3145
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
