Cases 21 - 30 of 1,280
Stewart v. Nina Arias LLC
as 1:2024cv02052
Plaintiff:
Michael Stewart
Defendant:
Nina Arias LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
S.E.C. v. Stewart
as 24-540
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ALLEN B. GOTTLIEB, GEORGE WALLACE STEWART, PATRICK J. MADDEN and others
Appellant:
PHYLLIS GOTTLIEB
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Abbey v. Aldag et al
as 1:2024cv01589
Plaintiff:
Kyle Abbey
Defendant:
Edward, Jr. K. Aldag, J. Kevin Hanna, R. Steven Hamner and others
Belcher v. Lauber
as 24-494
Plaintiff:
DAVID BELCHER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
MARTIN LAUBER, VINCENT T. CUBBAGE, VOLTA INC. and others
American Express Company v. Oliver
as 24-317
Petitioner:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY OLIVER, TERRY GAYLE QUINTON, SHAWN O'KEEFE and others
Dublino v. Terrana et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Dublino
Defendant:
Gina Terrana, Michael Caputi, Shane Craft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liu v. Heastie et al
as 1:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Lewis Y. Liu
Defendant:
Carl Heastie, William A. Barclay, Andrea Stewart-Cousins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
American Express Company v. Oliver
as 24-238
Petitioner:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY OLIVER, TERRY GAYLE QUINTON, SHAWN O'KEEFE and others
United States of America v. Thomas (Wallace)
as 24-196
Defendant:
NEGUS THOMAS, LAVAR JACKSON, KAVOHN TAYLOR and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JERKENO WALLACE and Uptown
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
