Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Cando v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03173
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Cando
Defendant:
The City of New York, Raymond Walter Kelly, The Associated Press and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roy v. Supreme Court of US
as 14-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lisa Nirban Roy
Defendant - Appellee:
Honorable J. Robert, United States of America, Government, United States Supreme Court and others
Akassy v. The Associated Press et al
as 1:2014cv03213
Plaintiff:
Hugues-Denver Akassy
Defendant:
The Associated Press and Jennifer Peltz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roy v. No Defendants Listed
as 1:2014cv01960
Defendant:
All States of USA, Associated Press, Democratic Party and others
Plaintiff:
Rev. Ms. Lisa Nirban Roy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spinelli et al v. National Footbal League et al
as 1:2013cv07398
Plaintiff:
Paul Spinelli , Scott Boehm , Paul Jasienski and others
Defendant:
National Footbal League , NFL Ventures, L.P. , NFL Productions, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Roy v. AT&T
as 13-1212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
The Rev. Dr. K.K.K. Roy
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, Verizon Inc., All B.O.E. and others
The Hart Island Project, Inc. v. The Associated Press
as 1:2013cv01630
Plaintiff:
The Hart Island Project, Inc.
Defendant:
The Associated Press
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Roy v. AT&T et al
as 1:2013cv00505
Plaintiff:
K.K.K. Roy
Defendant:
AT&T, Verizon Inc., All B.O.E. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
DAPD Nachrichtenagentur GmbH v. The Associated Press
as 1:2012cv08516
Plaintiff:
DAPD Nachrichtenagentur GmbH
Defendant:
The Associated Press
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Roy v. Mr. P.
as 1:2012cv06751
Plaintiff:
Kamal K.K. Roy
Defendant:
US Dept of Treasury, Mary Zypinski, N C G GOP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
