Cases 21 - 30 of 12,295
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07852
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
De Los Santos v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv08489
Defendant:
United States Army, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BRANDON C. DUMOND
Plaintiff:
DAVID DE LOS SANTOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08490
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Amara v. Cigna Corp.
as 24-2913
Defendant:
CIGNA CORP. and CIGNA PENSION PLAN
Plaintiff:
JANICE C. AMARA, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, GISELA R. BRODERICK and ANNETTE S. GLANZ
Mejia v. Banks
as 24-2901
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and DAVID C. BANKS, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education
Plaintiff:
JANERIS RODRIGUEZ MEJIA, as Parent and Natural Guardian of E.D. and Individually
Olsen v. The Sherry-Netherland, Inc.
as 24-2906
Defendant:
IRA A. LIPMAN, THE SHERRY-NETHERLAND, INC., A New York Corporation, MICHAEL J. HORVITZ and others
Plaintiff:
REY OLSEN, as assignee of Roque De La Fuente, an individual
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07714
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
