Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Family Dollar Stores, Inc. v. Overseas Direct Import Co., Ltd.
as 1:2011cv00690
Plaintiff:
Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
Defendant:
Overseas Direct Import Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Rancharan v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
as 1:2010cv07580
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rancharan
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Overseas Direct Import Co., Ltd. v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04919
Plaintiff:
Overseas Direct Import Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores, Inc. and Prestige Global Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Parish v. Family Dollar Stores Inc.
as 1:2010cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Parish
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friedman v. Family Dollar Stores Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ruth Friedman
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores Inc and Family Dollar Stores of CT Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv06859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Rancharan v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
as 2:2009cv01911
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rancharan
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Estee Lauder Inc. et al v. Preferred Fragrances, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv05333
Plaintiff:
Estee Lauder Inc., Estee Lauder Inc. and Clinique Laboratories, Inc.
Defendant:
Preferred Fragrances, Inc., Izriel Polatsek, CVS Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
