Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Bloomfield v. Pataki
as 9:2008cv00619
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bloomfield
Defendant:
George E. Pataki
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McGoey v. Pataki et al
as 1:2008cv03780
Plaintiff:
James Joseph McGoey
Defendant:
George E. Pataki, John Doe, Tanourey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Krebs v. Spitzer et al
as 9:2008cv00255
Plaintiff:
Larry Krebs
Defendant:
Elliot Spitzer, George Alexander, George E. Pataki and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tucker v. Pataki et al
as 7:2007cv11569
Petitioner:
Lance E. Tucker
Respondent:
George E. Pataki, Eliot S. Spitzer, Robert Dennison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kinlaw v. Doe et al
as 9:2007cv01314
Plaintiff:
Arthur Kinlaw
Defendant:
Mary Doe, Christen Kuzema, Linda Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 9:2007cv01218
Petitioner:
Jan Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Michael Mukasey, G.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Canzoneri v. Magnolia Plaza Apartments et al
as 1:2007cv04527
Plaintiff:
Jo Anna Canzoneri
Defendant:
Magnolia Plaza Apartments, Saint Ambrose Apartments, Instlcorp Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Canzoneri et al v. Magnolia Plaza Apartments et al
as 1:2007cv04607
Plaintiff:
Jo Anna Canzoneri, John Does 1-1000 and Jane Does 1-1000
Defendant:
Magnolia Plaza Apartments, Saint Ambrose Apartments, Instlcorp Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kinlaw et al v. Pataki et al
as 1:2007cv00574
Plaintiff:
Arthur Kinlaw, Mary Doe, Christen Kuzema and others
Defendant:
George E. Pataki, Glenn S. Goord and Gill Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Pataki et al
as 9:2007cv00863
Petitioner:
Peter Wheeler
Respondent:
George E. Pataki and Donald Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
