Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2019cv02302
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Estate of Yonadav Hirshfeld et al v. The Bank of China Limited
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2018cv01982
Plaintiff:
Estate of Yonadav Hirshfeld , Elisheva Hirshfeld , Zemach Hirshfeld and others
Defendant:
The Bank of China Limited
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
STUART'S LLC et al
as 1:2017mc00415
Creditor:
HANA FINANCIAL, INC.
Debtor:
STUART'S LLC, STUART EDELMAN and WAYNE D GALVIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04573
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Chavis v. Schroeder
as 16-2793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
George Chavis
Defendant - Appellee:
H. Kenneth Schroeder, S. Wenderlinch, Lieutenant J. Lamanna and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.