Cases 21 - 30 of 94
Bied v. County of Rensselaer et al
as 1:2015cv01011
Defendant:
Wendy A. Meehan, County of Rensselaer, Hudson Valley Community College and others
Plaintiff:
Michaela Bied
Not Classified By Court:
John L. Murad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thousand v. King et al
as 9:2017cv01003
Plaintiff:
Robert Thousand
Defendant:
G. King, J. Miller, Michael Kirkpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. New York State Supreme Court f
as 17-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Reaves
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Supreme Court for the Second Judicial District, Sylvia G. Ash, Bruce M. Balter and others
Reaves v. Supreme Court State of New York, Second Judicial District et al
as 1:2017cv01693
Defendant:
Sheila Abdus-Salam, Rachel Amy Adams, Sylvia G. Ash and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Miller
as 17-467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Peterson
Defendant - Appellee:
Honorable Thomas J. Miller, County Court, Syracuse New York 13202
Miller v. Graham
as 1:2016cv00687
Petitioner:
William J Miller
Respondent:
Harold H. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Milcon Construction Corp. et al
as 2:2016cv04504
Defendant:
CTC Contracting Corp., Milcon Construction Corp., Marcy Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Utica Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Peterson v. Miller
as 9:2016cv00743
Plaintiff:
Carlos Peterson
Defendant:
Thomas J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Miller
as 1:2016cv04451
Plaintiff:
Carlos Peterson
Defendant:
Thomas J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
