Cases 21 - 30 of 165
Camacho v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00228
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Melvin Camacho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Zongos v. Berryhill
as 5:2019cv00268
Plaintiff:
Shari Lee Zongos
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rountree v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00194
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Letisha Renee Rountree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Gentles v. Berryhill
as 8:2019cv00208
Plaintiff:
Laurie Gentles
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hamilton v. Berryhill
as 8:2019cv00226
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Cassandraraelyn Hamilton and CassandraRaelynn Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jolley v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00174
Plaintiff:
Scott Jolley
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
McQuillan v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00191
Defendant:
John H Durham, Commissioner Nancy Berryhill, Matthew G Whitaker and others
Claimant:
Tammy Lynn McQuillan
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Tammy McQuillan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lopez v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv12201
Plaintiff:
Jorge Lopez
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Nancy A Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. Berryhill
as 7:2019cv00418
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Jones
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Minter v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv02055
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Marvin E Minter, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
