Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Keita v. Newrez et al
as 1:2022cv06506
Defendant:
Newrez, PHH Mortgage Services, Pioneer Abstract Service Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Keita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Castro v. NewRez LLC et al
as 2:2022cv06340
Plaintiff:
Mario E. Castro
Defendant:
NewRez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortage Servicing, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv06625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McAlonen v. Newrez LLC
as 1:2022cv04524
Plaintiff:
Thomas McAlonen
Defendant:
Newrez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Weinlein et al
as 1:2022cv00769
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Laurie Weinlein
Claimant:
Johnny D. Perry and Newrez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3664 e Civil Enforcement of Crim. Restitution Obligation
Juhasz v. Ecker et al
as 7:2022cv05644
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Judge Lawrence H. Ecker, Judge Damaris Torrent and others
Plaintiff:
Edith Juhasz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
