Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Sawant v. Ramsey
as 12-3926
Plaintiff:
Anil Sawant, Enrique Jose Contreras, Jose Suarez and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Radar Devices Inc., Anastasia Michos, Diana L. Nassaney and others
Defendant:
Geoffrey W. Ramsey, Roger Lockhart and Peter Sarmanian
Defendant - Appellant:
David J. Murphy
Sawant v. Ramsey
as 12-3034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anil Sawant, Radar Devices Inc., Enrique Jose Contreras and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Geoffrey W. Ramsey, David J. Murphy, Roger Lockhart and others
Bae et al v. Kim et al
as 1:2011cv06240
Plaintiff:
Sung K. Bae, Jeong J. Lee, Hyun S. Park and others
Defendant:
Hwan K. Kim, Jeung S. Lee, New York Chinese Restaurant and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Armstrong et al v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00489
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Armstrong , Douglas Aukema , Patricia A. Aukema and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC and Statoilhydro USA Onshore Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Nathel & Nathel Inc. v. Sang IL Farm Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02165
Plaintiff:
Nathel & Nathel Inc.
Defendant:
Sang IL Farm Inc., Sang Ho Choy, Gen S. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Sawant v. Ramsey
as 10-4253
Plaintiff:
Anil Sawant, Boune Ome Rahanavong, Per F. Fjortoft and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Radar Devices Inc., Enrique Jose Contreras, Jose Suarez and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Geoffrey W. Ramsey, David J. Murphy, Peter Sarmanian and others
O'Dell v. Chruscicki et al
as 7:2009cv06675
Plaintiff:
Donald O'Dell
Defendant:
Daniel Andrew Chruscicki, Paul S. Lee, Jacob Rosenbaum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Sawant et al v. Ramsey et al
as 3:2007cv00980
Plaintiff:
Anil Sawant, Radar Devices Inc, Enrique Jose Contreras and others
Defendant:
Geoffrey W. Ramsey, David J. Murphy, Roger Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
