Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Sillman v. Rosenthal et al
as 3:2012cv00593
Plaintiff:
Edith Sillman
Defendant:
Maureen Rosenthal , Sara Ann Trachtenberg, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Judd v. Secretary of State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2011cv00879
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Secretary of State of Connecticut and State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copp v. Secretary of State
as 3:2010cv01604
Plaintiff:
Paul Copp
Defendant:
Secretary of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bonsu v. Attorney General et al
as 3:2010cv00860
Plaintiff:
Nana Osei Bonsu
Defendant:
US Attorney General, US Department of State, US Secretary of State and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Nuller et al v. Secretary of State et al
as 3:2008cv01955
Plaintiff:
Margarita Nuller and Dmitri Sibaev
Defendant:
Secretary of State, United States Consulate and Dept of Homeland
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Libertarian Party of CT et al v. Secretary of State
as 3:2008cv01513
Plaintiff:
Libertarian Party of CT, Richard Lion, Richard C. Connelly, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Secretary of State and Secretary of State
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thompson v. Staffieri et al
as 3:2007cv01439
Plaintiff:
Mel Thompson
Defendant:
Anthony Staffieri, Laura Wabno, Marcy McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Patton et al v. Democrat Town Committee of Willington et al
as 3:2007cv01308
Plaintiff:
John Patton, Robert Lisiewski and David Charette
Defendant:
Democrat Town Committee of Willington, Republican Town Committee of Willington, John Blessington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MacKinnon v. Attorney General et al
as 3:2007cv00977
Petitioner:
John Ross MacKinnon
Respondent:
Attorney General, US Citizenship & Immigration Svc and DHS Secretary
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
