Cases 21 - 30 of 223
Perez v. Astro Communications 401(K) Plan
as 2:2016cv02173
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Astro Communications 401(K) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hon. Thomas E. Perez v. York Metal Toll Processing, Inc.
as 5:2016mc00013
Plaintiff:
Hon. Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
York Metal Toll Processing, Inc.
Perez v. Skyline, LLC
as 2:2016cv01181
Movant:
Thomas E. Perez
Suffolk County:
Skyline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Perez v. Joyce Klindt, MD
as 2:2016cv01182
Defendant:
Joyce Klindt, MD
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Perez v. Perforated Screen Surfaces, Inc.
as 3:2016mc00011
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Perforated Screen Surfaces, Inc.
Perez v. Regional Environmental Demolition, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00149
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Regional Environmental Demolition, Inc., Charles Van Epps and Enrico Liberale
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
P.T. Thomas, Inc. et al v. Perez et al
as 1:2016cv01090
Plaintiff:
P.T. Thomas, Inc. and Nadi Ganesan Viswanathan
Defendant:
Thomas E. Perez and ALC Certification Officer
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Perez v. Northeast Landscape & Masonry Associates, Inc. et al
as 7:2016mc00050
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez
Respondent:
Northeast Landscape & Masonry Associates, Inc. and Anthony Pergola
Perez v. George Parsons General Contracting Corp. et al
as 2:2016cv00191
Defendant:
George H. George, George Parsons General Contracting Corp., George Parsons Roofing and Siding Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perez et al v. The Travelers Companies, Inc
as 1:2016mc00004
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez and Secretary of Labor United States Department of Laobr
Defendant:
The Travelers Companies, Inc
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
