Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bersoum v. Abotaeta
as 1:2016cv00987
Plaintiff:
Boshra Farid Youssef Bersoum , Waheed Mankorios , Michael Mankorios and others
Defendant:
Mustafa T.A Abotaeta, Al-Mahdi Hassan Muftah Allabad and Mohamed Al Mismari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
Thomas v. Shiloh Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07449
Plaintiff:
Raymond Thomas
Defendant:
Shiloh Industries, Inc. , Ramzi Hermiz and Thomas M. Dugan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv09496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. Salameh (Yousef)
as 11-3920
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mohammad A. Salameh, Nidal Ayyad, Mahmud Abouhalima, AKA Mahmoud Abu Halima and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ramzi Ahmed Yousef
St. Onge v. 145-147 Noble St. Realty Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv03602
Defendant:
145-147 Noble St. Realty Corp., Maria Baginski, Richard Baginski and others
Plaintiff:
George H. St. Onge, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06346
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Rosas v. Fidelity Borrowing LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00203
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rosas
Defendant:
Fidelity Borrowing LLC, R.K. Marketing Group, Inc. and Ramzi Kaywood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
