Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 371
Mayers v. Racino et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv05183
Plaintiff: Keston J. Mayers
Defendant: Brad Racino, Syracuse.com/NY Cannabis Insider, Advance Media New York and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
August Image, LLC v.The Brad Lebeau Company, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv04851
Plaintiff: August Image, LLC
Defendant: THE BRAD LEBEAU COMPANY, INC. d/b/a http://www.promotionmusicnews.com/ and The Brad Lebeau Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1018
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Archer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2023cv05775
Plaintiff: Kevin Archer, Xavier Bailey, Logen Ball and others
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC Chemical Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 23-946
Petitioner: Towaki Komatsu
Respondent: The City of New York, Howard Redmond, NYPD Inspector, sued in individual and official capacities, Ralph Nieves, former NYPD Lieutenant, sued in individual and official capacities and others
Clanton v. blinken et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv04284
Plaintiff: Stanford Charles Clanton
Defendant: antony john blinken secretary of state, et al. United States doing business as Antony John Blinken, janet louise yellen secretary of treasury, et al. United States doing business as Janet Louise Yellen, merrick garland attorney general, et al. United States doing business as Merrick Garland, et al. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Demarest v. Underhill
as 22-956
Plaintiff / Appellant: David P. Demarest and David Parsons Demarest
Defendant / Appellee: Town of Underhill, a municipality and charter town, Daniel Steinabauer, as an individual and in official capacity as Selectboard Chair, Bob Stone, as an individual and in official capacity and others
Defendant: Front Porch Forum, as a Public Benefit 15 Corporation fairly treated as acting under color of law due to past and present 16 factual considerations while serving the traditional governmental role of providing 17 "Essential Civic Infrastructure" rangi and Jericho Underhill Land Trust, as NonProfit 21 Corporation fairly treated as acting under color of law due to past and present 22 factual considerations and a special relationship willfully participating in and 23 actively directing acquisition of mun
Carter v. CIOX Health, LLC
as 22-2036
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marissa Carter, Evelyn Grys, Bruce Currier and others
Defendant / Appellee: COIX Health, LLC f/k/a HealthPort Technologies, LLC, The Rochester General Hospital, The Unity Hospital of Rochester and others
WB&B Executive Search, LLC v. City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03296
Plaintiff: WB&B Executive Search, LLC
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Brad Lander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
In Re: Auction Houses Anti., et al v. , et al
as 1:2000cv00648
Consolidated Plaintiff: Robert A. Daly, Jr., Ronald Black, Vicki Haberman and others
Claimant: N.B.S. Diamonds, Inc., Seymour Stein, Louis Glick Diamond Corp. d/b/a Louis Glick & Co. and others
Consolidated Defendant: Sotheby's Inc., Christopher M. Davidge, Abraham & Associates and others
Defendant: Fataihi Company of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, A. Alfred Taubman, Swicorp, S.A. and others
Interested Party: United States Of America and The United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff: J&J Lubrano, Giovanna Terruzzi, Pamela Alper and others
Petitioner: Boies, Schiller & Flexner, L.L.P.
Plaintiff: Herbert Black
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?