Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Toolasprashad v. Schult We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2010cv01050
Petitioner: Latchmie Narayan Toolasprashad
Respondent: Deborah G. Schult
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gutierrez v. Shult et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2010cv00488
Plaintiff: George Anthony Gutierrez
Defendant: Deborah G. Shult, Kevin Hayes and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sliney v. Schult
as 10-648
Petitioner - Appellant: Albert Sliney
Respondent - Appellee: Deborah G. Schult, Warden
Marino v. Schult
as 10-576
Petitioner - Appellant: Vincent Michael Marino
Respondent - Appellee: Deborah G. Schult, Warden
Zebrowski v. Schult
as 9:2010cv00028
Petitioner: Richard Zebrowski
Respondent: Deborah G. Schult
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gutierrez v. Schult
as 9:2009cv01200
Petitioner: George Anthony Gutierrez
Respondent: Deborah G. Schult
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Neal v. Schult We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2009cv00987
Petitioner: Reginald Neal
Respondent: Deborah G. Schult
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Patterson v. Schult
as 9:2009cv00988
Petitioner: Jason Brian Patterson
Respondent: Deborah G. Schult
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sullivan v. Schult
as 9:2009cv00904
Petitioner: Brian Sullivan
Respondent: Deborah G. Schult
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richardson v. Schult et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2009cv00868
Plaintiff: James Davon Richardson
Defendant: Deborah G. Schult and Mr. Poirier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?